From d47936fa84f9decc3842a11b98621d0bc45189f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hui Lan Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 20:53:11 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] README.md: a few edits in the section How to Contribute --- README.md | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 87cc3df..baf27e4 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -64,10 +64,15 @@ Send Hui (lanhui at zjnu.edu.cn) an email message including your GitHub account Currently, there are 9 members in *Lan Laboratory* (https://github.com/orgs/lanlab-org/people). -You will use the feature-branching workflow when interaction with the central repo. The main point of this workflow is that you work on a branch on your local drive, push that branch -to the central repo, and create a Pull Request (i.e., Pull Me Request) at GitHub for other people to review your changes. +You will use the feature-branching workflow (see below) when +interacting with the central repo. The main point of this workflow is +that you work on a branch on your local drive, push that branch to the +central repo, and create a Pull Request (i.e., Pull Me Request) at +GitHub for other people to review your changes. When everything is +OK, then you could merge your changes to the master branch in the +central repo. -I believe that *code review* is a very important activity for effectively improving code quality and promoting participation. +I believe that *code review* at the Pull Request stage is a very important activity for effectively improving both code quality and team quality. ## The feature-branching workflow